Rule B.6: Order of Parentheticals Within a Citation

Parentheticals provided by the author should remain unless the EIC/EE asks staff to revise or remove them. TLR follows Bluebook Rule 1.5 and related rules on parentheticals but includes two additional parentheticals, highlighted in bold text below. See TLR C.2 on page 29 to determine when to use these additional parentheticals.

(date) [hereinafter short name] (en banc) (Lastname, J., concurring) (plurality opinion) (per curiam) (omission in original) (alteration in original) (emphasis added) (footnote omitted) (citation(s) omitted) (quoting another source) (internal quotation mark(s) omitted) (citing another source), http://www.domainname.com (explanatory parenthetical), prior or subsequent history.

Return to Red Rules

By Fiona Burke, Temple Law Review Volume 96 Staff Editor Liberals have, as exit polls and Bernie Sanders point out, largely lost the working class and, in fact, most of America. There are many reasons for this, all of which have been dissected and analyzed ad nauseum in the past few weeks and likely will be for even years. One such […]

Author: Jasnoor Hundal In early August 2023, the Supreme Court stayed the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision, In re Purdue Pharma L.P., and granted certiorari to hear oral argument in December of 2023. The parties were asked to brief and argue “[w]hether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a court to approve, as part of a […]

Randy Kominsky is a member of Temple Law’s Class of 1979. Mr. Kominsky was a staff editor for Volume 51 and an associate research editor for Volume 52 of Temple Law Review. His case note, Housing Discrimination – The Appropriate Evidentiary Standard for Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, was published in 1978.[1] After graduating, he moved […]