Juveniles Adjudicated for Sexual Offenses: Fallacies, Facts, and Faulty Policy

Volume 88, No. 4, Summer 2016

By Amanda M. Fanniff, Ph.D., Palo Alto University; Alex R. Piquero, Ph.D., University of Texas at Dallas; Edward P. Mulvey, Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Carol A. Schubert, MPH, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; and Anne-Marie R. Iselin, Ph.D., University of North Carolina-Wilmington [PDF]

This Article provides a brief overview of the specialized social control policies applied to juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses (JSOs), followed by a review of the existing literature regarding whether this population presents unique risk or treatment needs meriting specialized approaches. It concludes that there is little logical justification for current policies.

By Fiona Burke, Temple Law Review Volume 96 Staff Editor Liberals have, as exit polls and Bernie Sanders point out, largely lost the working class and, in fact, most of America. There are many reasons for this, all of which have been dissected and analyzed ad nauseum in the past few weeks and likely will be for even years. One such […]

Author: Jasnoor Hundal In early August 2023, the Supreme Court stayed the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision, In re Purdue Pharma L.P., and granted certiorari to hear oral argument in December of 2023. The parties were asked to brief and argue “[w]hether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a court to approve, as part of a […]

Randy Kominsky is a member of Temple Law’s Class of 1979. Mr. Kominsky was a staff editor for Volume 51 and an associate research editor for Volume 52 of Temple Law Review. His case note, Housing Discrimination – The Appropriate Evidentiary Standard for Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, was published in 1978.[1] After graduating, he moved […]