Caremark’s Behavioral Legacy

Volume 90, No. 4, Summer 2018

By Todd Haugh [PDF]

In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation has always been somewhat of a mystery to me. If you are not familiar with Caremark, few cases loom larger in the realm of corporate governance. The reason is that the opinion’s articulation of the standards for holding board members liable for failing to properly monitor the corporation “transformed Delaware law” by significantly expanding the responsibilities of corporate directors. Penned by legendary Delaware Chancery Court judge William T. Allen, Caremark is considered by some to be “the seminal modern case on directors’ liability for failure to act.”

Todd Haugh is an Assistant Professor of Business Law and Ethics at Indiana University, Kelley School of Business.

Tags: 2017 TLR symposium, spotlight

By Fiona Burke, Temple Law Review Volume 96 Staff Editor Liberals have, as exit polls and Bernie Sanders point out, largely lost the working class and, in fact, most of America. There are many reasons for this, all of which have been dissected and analyzed ad nauseum in the past few weeks and likely will be for even years. One such […]

Author: Jasnoor Hundal In early August 2023, the Supreme Court stayed the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision, In re Purdue Pharma L.P., and granted certiorari to hear oral argument in December of 2023. The parties were asked to brief and argue “[w]hether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a court to approve, as part of a […]

Randy Kominsky is a member of Temple Law’s Class of 1979. Mr. Kominsky was a staff editor for Volume 51 and an associate research editor for Volume 52 of Temple Law Review. His case note, Housing Discrimination – The Appropriate Evidentiary Standard for Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, was published in 1978.[1] After graduating, he moved […]